DEFINITIONS MATTER
SHOULD WE CALL PAUL'S EPISTLES SCRIPTURE?
Many Christians assert that Paul the Apostle is "Scripture" because that is what they have been taught as long as they can remember. Often they have never taken the time to identify as we just have the fifty-two (52) passages in the Bible which will define what is called "Scripture;" or "Scriptures;" as well as variations of the phrase "it is written" which appears ninety-nine (99) times for a total of one hundred fifty one (151) passages which do NOT point to Paul's writings as Scripture. What many do is cling to the one (1) passage in the entire Bible that seems to suggest Paul is Scripture without examining it closely. You would think that with one hundred fifty one (151) passages giving us a signal; or, direction that on its own it would be sufficient enough evidence. However there are those who are woefully; and, utterly deceived; and, no matter how much evidence we provide them; they simply cannot; and, will not see the truth because they lack "eyes to see;" or, "ears to hear" Messiah's call. They are engaged in denial; sometimes willfully. Self-delusion; self-denial; and, self-deception are very real. Messiah warns against deceiving yourself. This one particular passage that many hang their entire argument upon to say Paul is Scripture is in 2 Peter 3:16. Turn with me to verse 15 to begin please:
"...and consider that the longsuffering of our LORD is salvation--as also our beloved brother Paul,
according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, as also in all his epistles, speaking in them
of these things in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people
twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures, you therefore beloved, since
you know this before- hand, beware lest you also fall from your own steadfastness, being led away
with the error of the wicked; but grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and savior Jesus
Christ..."
"...and consider that the longsuffering of our LORD is salvation--as also our beloved brother Paul,
according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, as also in all his epistles, speaking in them
of these things in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people
twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures, you therefore beloved, since
you know this before- hand, beware lest you also fall from your own steadfastness, being led away
with the error of the wicked; but grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and savior Jesus
Christ..."
I would like to again remind you of the voluminous amount of material that is described as "scripture;" or "scriptures" or where "it is written" that is NOT Paul. There is no doubt that many will point out that one of the meanings of the term "scripture" according to Strong's is "something written" or "a document" in an attempt to include Paul's writings into the family of what is called "Scripture." If that were a valid and legitimate method of determining what is "scripture" then what is stopping us from including extra biblical works which were in existence prior to Paul's writing's; or, those which are works of Paul's contemporaries? Some would say the Cannon does.
The Qu'ran is written; yet, I will never make the mistake of calling it Scripture. The Hindu Veda's are written; yet, I will never mistake those for Scripture either. Nor will the Pearl of Great Price; The New York Times; Mad Magazine; or, 50 Shades of Grey accidentally enter into my speech as being classified as "scripture." Why? Because the Bible does NOT define those other books as scripture. Take care to note that Peter interestingly enough refers to what Paul writes as "all of Paul's epistles" instead of calling them "scripture." If Paul's Epistle's are scripture then why are the writing's of the Prophets of the TaNaK NEVER referred to as Epistle's?
Have you ever taken the time to examine where else; and, how the term "epistles" is used in the Bible to see how they are classified? Have you ever closely examined how the term "other" is used in Peter's passage? What about the "error of the wicked?" Has it ever crossed your mind what exactly that "error" is; or, even if the Bible defines it? What about the fact Peter indicates that men who are "untaught; and, untrained twist to their own destruction the other scriptures." What is it these men are untaught? What kind of training or teaching has Paul adhered to; or, been subject to which would enable him to render a proper understanding while others would so easily; and, dangerously misunderstand him? These are questions I hope to answer in this particular section. Please take careful note of this section; it might be the very thing which causes you to STOP twisting or torturing Paul's words yourself.
When I first began to examine the usage of the term "Epistle" as used in 2 Peter 3:16 I didn't have any preconceived ideas about what I would find. With today's technology it takes all of a few seconds to punch in a term in English; and a bit longer if you want to actually examine the spelling in Greek of each term to compare if a word is masculine; feminine; neuter; or to determine if it is first person; 2nd person; 3rd person; nominative; genitive; dative; or accusative. The Greek language has even more rules than English; and, without the help of a software program like E-Sword; Logos; or, a website like Biblos; or BlueLetterBible.com to help wade through the mass of material it can become confusing. What is even more confusing is how the Old Testament is severed from the New Testament by the way Concordances; and even software tend to NOT point out the usage; and, appearance of the Greek terms in the New Testament by directing the student to their appearance; and, usage in the Greek Translation of the Old Testament (LXX). To gear it more toward the layperson we should compare apples to apples instead of apples to bananas. Most of the time when one studies the Bible if they are a serious student they seek the underlying Greek meaning for terms in the New Testament; and, the Hebrew Meaning underlying the passages in the Old Testament. This is wise to do. However it serves to keep the two testaments separate as I stated earlier. When one examines the entire text in the Greek; it sheds MORE light on terms; and, provides a method to apply a more consistent exegesis of the Bible. Please understand I am NOT suggesting an abandonment of the Hebrew. I'm suggesting using a method of study which allows us to look at the book as being complete; and, not segregated.
For example the term for "Epistle" used in 2 Peter 3:16 is Strong's # G1992 (ἐπιστολη) epistolē "ep-is-tol-ay" and it means a "written message." It comes from Strong's G1989 (ἐπιστέλλω) epistellō pronounced "ep-ee-stel'-lo" and means to enjoin by writing; or to communicate by letter. If one were only using the King James Concordance they would be led to believe it only appears twenty four (24) times in the Bible. However if one were to check the Greek Concordance to the Scriptures which lists both the New Testament as well as the Old Testament appearances in the LXX it would show a total of forty-seven (47) appearances. Meanwhile the Concordance to the Septuagint shows just the appearances in the Greek Old Testament and lists only eighteen (18) appearances. If we only look in the Strong's Exhaustive Concordance we find only 21 appearances because it only lists those passages where it is translated as "Epistle" or "Epistles" instead of the other possible translations. My NIV Translation renders it "letters" and the New International Bible Concordance lists seventy eight (78) places the term "letter;" or "letters" appears. My point is that we need to do everything possible to ensure we are thorough and careful to identify all uses; and, appearances of terms so that we do not miss vital information; or, unintentionally misinterpret a terms original intent by the writers of the Bible. As useful as these tools are they are just the beginning of understanding a term.
When we begin to peel back the layers of English; then Greek; then Hebrew, sometimes we uncover things which cannot be seen on the surface. For example in the Greek Concordance it lists seven (7) different forms of the term "epistolē" while the LXX Concordance lists only six (6). Knowing which form is used; and, where helps to nail down a more precise meaning of the term you are researching. Examining other forms helps you to have an expanded understanding of how else it can be used.
The King James Concordance indicates it is translated thirteen (13) times as "epistle;" six (6) times as "letters;" three (3) times as "letter" and only two (2) times as "epistles." Again we see the failure to list the appearances of the term in the Greek Translation of the Old Testament (LXX); and, how those are translated into English. This is why I use several Concordances with regularity; one for the English; one for the Greek New Testament; one for the Greek Old Testament (LXX); and one for the Hebrew of the Old Testament (TaNaK). Because all six (6) of my concordances are integrated into E-Sword; along with twenty-five (25) different Bible translations; eleven (11) Bible Dictionaries both Greek; and, Hebrew it takes considerably less time to do research than someone searching for the exact same thing just twenty five years ago. Even with the last five (5) to ten (10) years their have been incredible advances in our ability to study the Bible more rapidly than ever before. Come with me as we see where and how this term "epistolē" is used.
The Qu'ran is written; yet, I will never make the mistake of calling it Scripture. The Hindu Veda's are written; yet, I will never mistake those for Scripture either. Nor will the Pearl of Great Price; The New York Times; Mad Magazine; or, 50 Shades of Grey accidentally enter into my speech as being classified as "scripture." Why? Because the Bible does NOT define those other books as scripture. Take care to note that Peter interestingly enough refers to what Paul writes as "all of Paul's epistles" instead of calling them "scripture." If Paul's Epistle's are scripture then why are the writing's of the Prophets of the TaNaK NEVER referred to as Epistle's?
Have you ever taken the time to examine where else; and, how the term "epistles" is used in the Bible to see how they are classified? Have you ever closely examined how the term "other" is used in Peter's passage? What about the "error of the wicked?" Has it ever crossed your mind what exactly that "error" is; or, even if the Bible defines it? What about the fact Peter indicates that men who are "untaught; and, untrained twist to their own destruction the other scriptures." What is it these men are untaught? What kind of training or teaching has Paul adhered to; or, been subject to which would enable him to render a proper understanding while others would so easily; and, dangerously misunderstand him? These are questions I hope to answer in this particular section. Please take careful note of this section; it might be the very thing which causes you to STOP twisting or torturing Paul's words yourself.
When I first began to examine the usage of the term "Epistle" as used in 2 Peter 3:16 I didn't have any preconceived ideas about what I would find. With today's technology it takes all of a few seconds to punch in a term in English; and a bit longer if you want to actually examine the spelling in Greek of each term to compare if a word is masculine; feminine; neuter; or to determine if it is first person; 2nd person; 3rd person; nominative; genitive; dative; or accusative. The Greek language has even more rules than English; and, without the help of a software program like E-Sword; Logos; or, a website like Biblos; or BlueLetterBible.com to help wade through the mass of material it can become confusing. What is even more confusing is how the Old Testament is severed from the New Testament by the way Concordances; and even software tend to NOT point out the usage; and, appearance of the Greek terms in the New Testament by directing the student to their appearance; and, usage in the Greek Translation of the Old Testament (LXX). To gear it more toward the layperson we should compare apples to apples instead of apples to bananas. Most of the time when one studies the Bible if they are a serious student they seek the underlying Greek meaning for terms in the New Testament; and, the Hebrew Meaning underlying the passages in the Old Testament. This is wise to do. However it serves to keep the two testaments separate as I stated earlier. When one examines the entire text in the Greek; it sheds MORE light on terms; and, provides a method to apply a more consistent exegesis of the Bible. Please understand I am NOT suggesting an abandonment of the Hebrew. I'm suggesting using a method of study which allows us to look at the book as being complete; and, not segregated.
For example the term for "Epistle" used in 2 Peter 3:16 is Strong's # G1992 (ἐπιστολη) epistolē "ep-is-tol-ay" and it means a "written message." It comes from Strong's G1989 (ἐπιστέλλω) epistellō pronounced "ep-ee-stel'-lo" and means to enjoin by writing; or to communicate by letter. If one were only using the King James Concordance they would be led to believe it only appears twenty four (24) times in the Bible. However if one were to check the Greek Concordance to the Scriptures which lists both the New Testament as well as the Old Testament appearances in the LXX it would show a total of forty-seven (47) appearances. Meanwhile the Concordance to the Septuagint shows just the appearances in the Greek Old Testament and lists only eighteen (18) appearances. If we only look in the Strong's Exhaustive Concordance we find only 21 appearances because it only lists those passages where it is translated as "Epistle" or "Epistles" instead of the other possible translations. My NIV Translation renders it "letters" and the New International Bible Concordance lists seventy eight (78) places the term "letter;" or "letters" appears. My point is that we need to do everything possible to ensure we are thorough and careful to identify all uses; and, appearances of terms so that we do not miss vital information; or, unintentionally misinterpret a terms original intent by the writers of the Bible. As useful as these tools are they are just the beginning of understanding a term.
When we begin to peel back the layers of English; then Greek; then Hebrew, sometimes we uncover things which cannot be seen on the surface. For example in the Greek Concordance it lists seven (7) different forms of the term "epistolē" while the LXX Concordance lists only six (6). Knowing which form is used; and, where helps to nail down a more precise meaning of the term you are researching. Examining other forms helps you to have an expanded understanding of how else it can be used.
The King James Concordance indicates it is translated thirteen (13) times as "epistle;" six (6) times as "letters;" three (3) times as "letter" and only two (2) times as "epistles." Again we see the failure to list the appearances of the term in the Greek Translation of the Old Testament (LXX); and, how those are translated into English. This is why I use several Concordances with regularity; one for the English; one for the Greek New Testament; one for the Greek Old Testament (LXX); and one for the Hebrew of the Old Testament (TaNaK). Because all six (6) of my concordances are integrated into E-Sword; along with twenty-five (25) different Bible translations; eleven (11) Bible Dictionaries both Greek; and, Hebrew it takes considerably less time to do research than someone searching for the exact same thing just twenty five years ago. Even with the last five (5) to ten (10) years their have been incredible advances in our ability to study the Bible more rapidly than ever before. Come with me as we see where and how this term "epistolē" is used.
The very first time we ever see this term used is in 2 Chronicles 30:1 Turn there with me please.
"And Hezekiah sent to all Israel and Judah, and also wrote letters to Ephraim and Manasseh, that
they should come to the house of the Lord at Jerusalem, to keep the Passover to the Lord God of
Israel."
LXX:
Καὶ ἀπέστειλεν Εζεκιας ἐπὶ πάντα Ισραηλ καὶ Ιουδαν καὶ
ἐπιστολὰς G1992 ἔγραψεν ἐπὶ τὸν Εφραιμ καὶ Μανασση
ἐλθεῖν εἰς οἶκον κυρίου εἰς Ιερουσαλημ ποιῆσαι τὸ φασεκ
τῷ κυρίῳ θεῷ Ισραηλ·
ἐπιστολὰς G1992 ἔγραψεν ἐπὶ τὸν Εφραιμ καὶ Μανασση
ἐλθεῖν εἰς οἶκον κυρίου εἰς Ιερουσαλημ ποιῆσαι τὸ φασεκ
τῷ κυρίῳ θεῷ Ισραηλ·
επιστολας "epistolas"
וישלח יחזקיהו על־כל־ישראל ויהודה וגם־אגרות כתב על־אפרים ומנשה לבוא לבית־יהוה בירושלם לעשות פסח ליהוה אלהי ישראל׃
Screen Shot of Blue Letter Bible for 2 Chronicles 30:1
H104: (אגּרא) 'iggerâ' ig-er-aw' (Chaldee); of Persian origin; an epistle
(as carried by a state courier; or, postman): - letter.
As we go through these passages what I would encourage you to take note of is what precisely is being referenced by the Greek forms of "Epistole." It should become clear that it is referring not to Scripture itself but rather letters written by men. Although Prophets are also in fact MEN; the point is that ALL the Prophets wrote specifically because they were directed by (יהוה) and given prophecy to deliver. I too am a man; and, although I might quote scripture; even direct you to return to the ancient path just as the Prophets of old did; that does not make my written letter to you; this book, scripture. What I have written to you friends is MY Epistle, MY LETTER to you, born out of love given to me by (יהוה) and His servant Yeshua the Nazarene whose sacrifice cleanses us from our disobedience. Turn with me please to the next appearance of "epistole" in the Greek.
2 Chronicles 30:6:
"Then the runners went throughout all Israel and Judah with the letters from the king and his
leaders, and spoke according to the command of the king: “Children of Israel, return to the Lord
God of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel; then He will return to the remnant of you who have escaped
from the hand of the kings of Assyria..."
LXX:
έπιστολαίς "epistolais"
leaders, and spoke according to the command of the king: “Children of Israel, return to the Lord
God of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel; then He will return to the remnant of you who have escaped
from the hand of the kings of Assyria..."
LXX:
καὶ ἐπορεύθησαν οἱ τρέχοντες σὺν ταῖς ἐπιστολαῖς παρὰ
τοῦ βασιλέως καὶ τῶν ἀρχόντων εἰς πάντα Ισραηλ καὶ
Ιουδαν κατὰ τὸ πρόσταγμα τοῦ βασιλέως λέγοντες Υἱοὶ
Ισραηλ, ἐπιστρέψατε πρὸς θεὸν Αβρααμ καὶ Ισαακ καὶ
Ισραηλ, καὶ ἐπιστρέψει τοὺς ἀνασεσῳσμένους τοὺς
καταλειφθέντας ἀπὸ χειρὸς βασιλέως Ασσουρ·
HEBREW: (Masoretic Text)
וילכו הרצים באגרות מיד המלך ושריו בכל־ישראל ויהודה וכמצות המלך לאמר בני ישראל שובו אל־יהוה אלהי אברהם יצחק וישראל וישב אל־הפליטה הנשארת לכם מכף מלכי אשור׃
Screenshot from BlueLetterBible.com
Again we discover the same root of "epistilo;" and, again it is used to translate a Hebrew term meaning "letters" which is not used specifically to reference Scripture. Again follow me as we press on.
Ezra 4:6:
"In the reign of Ahasuerus, in the beginning of his reign, they wrote an accusation against the
inhabitants of Judah and Jerusalem."
inhabitants of Judah and Jerusalem."
LXX:
καὶ ἐν βασιλείᾳ Ασουηρου ἐν ἀρχῇ βασιλείας αὐτοῦ
ἔγραψαν (G1125) ἐπιστολὴν (G1992) ἐπὶ οἰκοῦντας Ιουδα
καὶ Ιερουσαλημ.
ἐπιστολὴν "epistolen"
καὶ ἐν βασιλείᾳ Ασουηρου ἐν ἀρχῇ βασιλείας αὐτοῦ
ἔγραψαν (G1125) ἐπιστολὴν (G1992) ἐπὶ οἰκοῦντας Ιουδα
καὶ Ιερουσαλημ.
ἐπιστολὴν "epistolen"
HEBREW:
ובמלכות אחשורוש בתחלת מלכותו כתבו שטנה על־ישבי יהודה וירושלם׃ ס
In this particular passage the Greek term (ἐπιστολὴν) "epistolen" is used to translate the Hebrew term "śiṭnâh" (שׂטנה) Strong's # H7855 which means "opposition (by letter): - accusation." It comes from another term H7853 "śâṭan" (שׂטן) which means "to attack; accuse; be an adversary; to resist. And just like Satan the attack is not based in truth.
Ezra 4:8:
"Rehum the commander and Shimshai the scribe wrote a letter against Jerusalem to King Artaxerxes
in this fashion:"
in this fashion:"
LXX:
Ραουμ βααλταμ καὶ Σαμσαι ὁ γραμματεὺς ἔγραψαν (G1125)
ἐπιστολὴν (G1992) μίαν κατὰ Ιερουσαλημ τῷ Αρθασασθα
βασιλεῖ.
ἐπιστολὴν "epistolen"
HEBREW:
רחום בעל־טעם ושמשי ספרא כתבו אגרה חדה על־ירושלם לארתחששתא מלכא כנמא
Screenshot blueletterbible.com
In this passage we clearly see "epistole" is used to translate the Hebrew H104 which we have already defined previously. Again we find a letter from men; and, in this particular letter the writers seek to turn a King and those loyal to him against Jerusalem and those who seek its rebuilding because of their own hatred and jealously towards the Children of Israel. Not much has changed in the last 2,000 years has it? The Adversary and those loyal to him hate Israel; and, seek to derail the temple's construction in any way possible.
Ezra 4:11:
"This is a copy of the letter that they sent him even unto Artaxerxes the king; Thy servants the men on
this side the river, and at such a time."
this side the river, and at such a time."
LXX:
αὕτη ἡ διαταγὴ τῆς ἐπιστολῆς (G1992) ἧς ἀπέστειλαν πρὸς
αὐτόν πρὸς Αρθασασθα βασιλέα παῖδές σου ἄνδρες πέραν
τοῦ ποταμοῦ.
ἐπιστολῆς "epistoles"
HEBREW:
דנה פרשגן אגרתא די שלחו עלוהי על־ארתחששתא מלכא עבדיך אנש עבר־נהרה וכענת
Here again we find "epistoles" used to translate the Hebrew term "iggera." Keep up with me if you will. Let's move on to Ezra 5:6 if you would.
Ezra 5:6:
"This is a copy of the letter that Tattenai sent: The governor of the region beyond the River, and
Shethar-Boznai, and his companions, the Persians who were in the region beyond the River, to
Darius the king:"
Shethar-Boznai, and his companions, the Persians who were in the region beyond the River, to
Darius the king:"
LXX:
διασάφησις ἐπιστολῆς (G1992) ἧς ἀπέστειλεν Θανθαναι ὁ
ἔπαρχος τοῦ πέραν τοῦ ποταμοῦ καὶ Σαθαρβουζανα καὶ οἱ
σύνδουλοι αὐτῶν Αφαρσαχαῖοι οἱ ἐν τῷ πέραν τοῦ ποταμοῦ
Δαρείῳ τῷ βασιλεῖ.
ἐπιστολῆς "epistoles"
HEBREW:
פרשגן אגרתא די־שלח תתני פחת עבר־נהרה ושתר בוזני וכנותה אפרסכיא די בעבר נהרה על־דריוש מלכא
And again we find a similar result. Let's move on to Nehemiah shall we?
Nehemiah 2: 7-9 (3 times):
Nehemiah 2: 7-9 (3 times):
"7 Furthermore I said to the king, “If it pleases the king, let letters be given to me for the governors of
the region beyond the River, that they must permit me to pass through till I come to Judah, 8 and a
letter to Asaph the keeper of the king’s forest, that he must give me timber to make beams for the
gates of the citadel which pertains to the temple, for the city wall, and for the house that I will
occupy.”... upon me. 9 Then I went to the governors in the region beyond the River, and gave them
the king’s letters..."
the region beyond the River, that they must permit me to pass through till I come to Judah, 8 and a
letter to Asaph the keeper of the king’s forest, that he must give me timber to make beams for the
gates of the citadel which pertains to the temple, for the city wall, and for the house that I will
occupy.”... upon me. 9 Then I went to the governors in the region beyond the River, and gave them
the king’s letters..."
LXX:
2:7 καὶ εἶπα τῷ βασιλεῖ εἰ ἐπὶ τὸν βασιλέα ἀγαθόν δότω μοι
ἐπιστολὰς (G1992) πρὸς τοὺς ἐπάρχους πέραν τοῦ
ποταμοῦ ὥστε παραγαγεῖν με ἕως ἔλθω ἐπὶ Ιουδαν
2:8 καὶ ἐπιστολὴν (G1992) ἐπὶ Ασαφ φύλακα τοῦ
παραδείσου ὅς ἐστιν τῷ βασιλεῖ ὥστε δοῦναί μοι ξύλα
στεγάσαι τὰς πύλας καὶ εἰς τὸ τεῖχος τῆς πόλεως καὶ εἰς
οἶκον ὃν εἰσελεύσομαι εἰς αὐτόν καὶ ἔδωκέν μοι ὁ
βασιλεὺς ὡς χεὶρ θεοῦ ἡ ἀγαθή
2:9 καὶ ἦλθον πρὸς τοὺς ἐπάρχους πέραν τοῦ ποταμοῦ καὶ
ἔδωκα αὐτοῖς τὰς ἐπιστολὰς (G1992) τοῦ βασιλέως καὶ
ἀπέστειλεν μετ᾽ ἐμοῦ ὁ βασιλεὺς ἀρχηγοὺς δυνάμεως
καὶ ἱππεῖς.
ἐπιστολὰς "epistolas" (plural)
ἐπιστολὴν "epistolen" (singular)
ἐπιστολὰς "epistolas" (plural)
ἐπιστολὰς (G1992) πρὸς τοὺς ἐπάρχους πέραν τοῦ
ποταμοῦ ὥστε παραγαγεῖν με ἕως ἔλθω ἐπὶ Ιουδαν
2:8 καὶ ἐπιστολὴν (G1992) ἐπὶ Ασαφ φύλακα τοῦ
παραδείσου ὅς ἐστιν τῷ βασιλεῖ ὥστε δοῦναί μοι ξύλα
στεγάσαι τὰς πύλας καὶ εἰς τὸ τεῖχος τῆς πόλεως καὶ εἰς
οἶκον ὃν εἰσελεύσομαι εἰς αὐτόν καὶ ἔδωκέν μοι ὁ
βασιλεὺς ὡς χεὶρ θεοῦ ἡ ἀγαθή
2:9 καὶ ἦλθον πρὸς τοὺς ἐπάρχους πέραν τοῦ ποταμοῦ καὶ
ἔδωκα αὐτοῖς τὰς ἐπιστολὰς (G1992) τοῦ βασιλέως καὶ
ἀπέστειλεν μετ᾽ ἐμοῦ ὁ βασιλεὺς ἀρχηγοὺς δυνάμεως
καὶ ἱππεῖς.
ἐπιστολὰς "epistolas" (plural)
ἐπιστολὴν "epistolen" (singular)
ἐπιστολὰς "epistolas" (plural)
HEBREW: (Nehemiah 2:7)
ואומר למלך אם־על־המלך טוב אגרות יתנו־לי על־פחוות עבר הנהר אשר יעבירוני עד אשר־אבוא אל־יהודה׃
Nehemiah 2:8
ואגרת אל־אסף שמר הפרדס אשר למלך אשר יתן־לי עצים לקרות את־שערי הבירה אשר־לבית ולחומת העיר ולבית אשר־אבוא אליו ויתן־לי המלך כיד־אלהי הטובה עלי׃
Nehemiah 2:9
ואבוא אל־פחוות עבר הנהר ואתנה להם את אגרות המלך וישלח עמי המלך שרי חיל ופרשים׃
In all three verses we again find similar results. Are you seeing the pattern here?
Nehemiah 6:5:
"Then Sanballat sent his servant to me as before, the fifth time, with an open letter in his hand. 6 In it
was written:"
LXX:
was written:"
LXX:
καὶ ἀπέστειλεν πρός με Σαναβαλλατ τὸν παῖδα αὐτοῦ καὶ
ἐπιστολὴν (G1992) ἀνεῳγμένην ἐν χειρὶ αὐτοῦ.
ἐπιστολὴν "epistolen"
HEBREW:
וישלח אלי סנבלט כדבר הזה פעם חמישית את־נערו ואגרת פתוחה בידו
Again same thing.
Nehemiah 6:17:
"Also in those days the nobles of Judah sent many letters to Tobiah, and the letters of Tobiah came to
them."
them."
LXX:
καὶ ἐν ταῖς ἡμέραις ἐκείναις ἀπὸ πολλῶν ἐντίμων Ιουδα
ἐπιστολαὶ (G1992) ἐπορεύοντο πρὸς Τωβιαν, καὶ αἱ Τωβια
ἤρχοντο πρὸς αὐτούς.
ἐπιστολαὶ "epistolai"
HEBREW:
גם בימים ההם מרבים חרי יהודה אגרתיהם הולכות על־טוביה ואשר לטוביה באות אליהם
In this case the term "iggerah" looks different. That's because it IS different. It reflects there are MANY of these letters; not just two or three. It is a plural form. However it was relatively predictable.
Nehemiah 6:19:
"Also they reported his good deeds before me, and reported my words to him. Tobiah sent letters to
frighten me."
frighten me."
LXX:
καὶ τοὺς λόγους αὐτοῦ ἦσαν λέγοντες πρός με καὶ λόγους
μου ἦσαν ἐκφέροντες αὐτῷ, καὶ ἐπιστολὰς (G1992)
ἀπέστειλεν Τωβιας φοβερίσαι με.
ἐπιστολὰς "epistolas"
HEBREW:
גם טובתיו היו אמרים לפני ודברי היו מוציאים לו אגרות שלח טוביה ליראני
Esther 3:14:
"A copy of the document was to be issued as law in every province, being published for all people,
that they should be ready for that day."
LXX:
that they should be ready for that day."
LXX:
τὰ δὲ ἀντίγραφα τῶν ἐπιστολῶν (G1992) ἐξετίθετο κατὰ
χώραν, καὶ προσετάγη πᾶσι τοῖς ἔθνεσιν ἑτοίμους εἶναι εἰς
τὴν ἡμέραν ταύτην.
ἐπιστολῶν "epistolon"
HEBREW:
פתשגן הכתב להנתן דת בכל־מדינה ומדינה גלוי לכל־העמים להיות עתדים ליום הזה
In this previous section the Greek term "epistole" is used to translate the Hebrew term (כּתב) "kâthâb" Strong's # H3791 meaning: "something written; that is a writing, record, or book; register, scripture, writing." Yes the word CAN be used to mean "scripture" however; notice that the passage doesn't reference what the Bible has called "Scripture" it is simply a reference to a letter which was written by King Ahasuerus allowing the Jews to be destroyed because Haman had petitioned the King and depositing a bribe into the treasury to facilitate their demise.
Esther 9:26:
"So they called these days Purim, after the name Pur. Therefore, because of all the words of this
letter, what they had seen concerning this matter, and what had happened to them."
letter, what they had seen concerning this matter, and what had happened to them."
LXX:
διὰ τοῦτο ἐπεκλήθησαν αἱ ἡμέραι αὗται Φρουραι διὰ τοὺς
κλήρους, ὅτι τῇ διαλέκτῳ αὐτῶν καλοῦνται Φρουραι, διὰ
τοὺς λόγους τῆς ἐπιστολῆς (G1992) ταύτης καὶ ὅσα
πεπόνθασιν διὰ ταῦτα καὶ ὅσα αὐτοῖς ἐγένετο.
ἐπιστολῆς "epistoles"
HEBREW:
על־כן קראו לימים האלה פורים על־שם הפור על־כן על־כל־דברי האגרת הזאת ומה־ראו על־ככה ומה הגיע אליהם
Again we find the Greek term "epistole" used to translate the Hebrew term "iggereth" H107 (אגּרת) which we formerly identified and defined.
Esther 9:29:
Then Queen Esther, the daughter of Abihail, with Mordecai the Jew, wrote with full authority to
confirm this second letter about Purim.
confirm this second letter about Purim.
LXX:
καὶ ἔγραψεν Εσθηρ ἡ βασίλισσα θυγάτηρ Αμιναδαβ
καὶ Μαρδοχαῖος ὁ Ιουδαῖος ὅσα ἐποίησαν τό τε
στερέωμα τῆς ἐπιστολῆς (G1992) τῶν Φρουραι.
ἐπιστολῆς "epistoles"
HEBREW:
ותכתב אסתר המלכה בת־אביחיל ומרדכי היהודי את־כל־תקף לקים את אגרת הפורים הזאת השנית
Isaiah 18:2:
Which sends ambassadors by sea, Even in vessels of reed on
the waters, saying ,“Go, swift messengers, to a nation tall and
smooth of skin, To a people terrible from their beginning
onward, A nation powerful and treading down, Whose land
the rivers divide.”
LXX:
ὁ ἀποστέλλων ἐν θαλάσσῃ ὅμηρα καὶ ἐπιστολὰς (G1992)
βυβλίνας ἐπάνω τοῦ ὕδατος· πορεύσονται γὰρ ἄγγελοι κοῦφοι
πρὸς ἔθνος μετέωρον καὶ ξένον λαὸν καὶ χαλεπόν, τίς αὐτοῦ
ἐπέκεινα; ἔθνος ἀνέλπιστον καὶ καταπεπατημένον. νῦν οἱ
ποταμοὶ τῆς γῆς.
ἐπιστολὰς "epistolas"
HEBREW:
השלח בים צירים ובכלי־גמא על־פני־מים לכו מלאכים קלים אל־גוי ממשך ומורט אל־עם נורא מן־הוא והלאה גוי קו־קו ומבוסה אשר־בזאו נהרים ארצו
In this particular passage the Greek term "epistole" is rendered "reed" but is used to translate the Hebrew term H1573 (גּמא) "gôme'" which can mean papayrus something letters were written on. It is clearly NOT referring to scripture.
Isaiah 39:1:
At that time Merodach-Baladan the son of Baladan, king of Babylon, sent letters and a present to
Hezekiah, for he heard that he had been sick and had recovered.
Hezekiah, for he heard that he had been sick and had recovered.
LXX:
Ἐν τῷ καιρῷ ἐκείνῳ ἀπέστειλεν Μαρωδαχ υἱὸς τοῦ Λααδαν
ὁ βασιλεὺς τῆς Βαβυλωνίας ἐπιστολὰς (G1992) καὶ πρέσβεις
καὶ δῶρα Εζεκια· ἤκουσεν γὰρ ὅτι ἐμαλακίσθη ἕως θανάτου
καὶ ἀνέστη.
ἐπιστολὰς "epistolas"
ὁ βασιλεὺς τῆς Βαβυλωνίας ἐπιστολὰς (G1992) καὶ πρέσβεις
καὶ δῶρα Εζεκια· ἤκουσεν γὰρ ὅτι ἐμαλακίσθη ἕως θανάτου
καὶ ἀνέστη.
ἐπιστολὰς "epistolas"
HEBREW:
בעת ההוא שלח מרדך בלאדן בן־בלאדן מלך־בבל ספרים ומנחה אל־חזקיהו וישמע כי חלה ויחזק
In this particular passage we find the Greek term used to translate another Hebrew term. This time H5612 (ספרה) "siphrâh" meaning writing; the art or a document; by implication a book; bill; evidence; letter, register, or scroll. The man who is presenting letters to Hezekian is Merodach-baladan which means "Marduk has given a son." Marduk was a false god of the Babylonians and his name is obviously meant to honor this pagan deity. He is also the son a King Baladan whose name means "Bel (be his) lord." Because of these letters King Hezekiah showed Merodach-baladan all the gold; and wealth that was stored up in Hezekias household as well as the temple treasures. This would reveal to the King of Babylon what plunder he could take as spoil which was later done in multiple military campaigns against Israel by Babylon. These are NOT Scripture.
Jeremiah 29:1:
Now these are the words of the letter that Jeremiah the prophet sent from Jerusalem to the
remainder of the elders who were carried away captive—to the priests, the prophets, and all the
people whom Nebuchadnezzar had carried away captive from Jerusalem to Babylon.
remainder of the elders who were carried away captive—to the priests, the prophets, and all the
people whom Nebuchadnezzar had carried away captive from Jerusalem to Babylon.
LXX:
Καὶ οὗτοι οἱ λόγοι τῆς βίβλου, οὓς ἀπέστειλεν Ιερεμιας ἐξ
Ιερουσαλημ πρὸς τοὺς πρεσβυτέρους τῆς ἀποικίας καὶ πρὸς
τοὺς ἱερεῖς καὶ πρὸς τοὺς ψευδοπροφήτας ἐπιστολὴν (G1992)
εἰς Βαβυλῶνα τῇ ἀποικίᾳ καὶ πρὸς ἅπαντα τὸν λαὸν.
ἐπιστολὴν "epistolen"
HEBREW:
ואלה דברי הספר אשר שלח ירמיה הנביא מירושלם אל־יתר זקני הגולה ואל־הכהנים ואל־הנביאים ואל־כל־העם אשר הגלה נבוכדנאצר מירושלם בבלה
The letter which Jeremiah writes does indicate that he is passing along word directly from (יהוה) by the language he uses in the very beginning of the letter itself in verse 4:
"Thus says the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel to all who were carried away
captive, whom I have caused to be carried away from Jerusalem to Babylon..."
What is different about this particular use of (ἐπιστολὴν) is that when you examine the Hebrew text it is clearly INJECTED by the translators of the LXX. There is NO term in the passage in Hebrew which can be accounted for being translated as "epistle" in the exact location we find it. We DO find the Greek term (βίβλου) used to translate the Hebrew term H5612 (הספר) Sepher which is rendered "letter." Since we are comparing the usage and appearance of the term "epistilo" as to how it relates to being called "Scripture" we have so far in the Old Testament; the Hebrew TaNaK; and the LXX; NOT EVEN ONE EXAMPLE of "epistilo" being used to refer to Scripture. Although the Greek term (βίβλου) is used to translate the Hebrew term for letters it is NEVER used anywhere in the New Testament to refer to Paul or his writings. Friends the foundation asserts that Epistles are NOT Scripture. If you elevate Paul ABOVE what the Bible indicates IS Scripture you have twisted Paul; and the Scripture perverting; and torturing the text as those who are crooked do.
Acts 9:1-2:
Then Saul, still breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the Lord, went to the
high priest 2 and asked letters from him to the synagogues of Damascus, so that if he found
any who were of the Way, whether men or women, he might bring them bound to Jerusalem.
high priest 2 and asked letters from him to the synagogues of Damascus, so that if he found
any who were of the Way, whether men or women, he might bring them bound to Jerusalem.
Greek: επιστολας G1992 LETTERS
In this particular verse the term "epistilo" is used to refer to letters which came from religious leaders who were hostile to those of the Way. These letters are most certainly NOT Scripture.
Acts 15:30:
So when they were sent off, they came to Antioch; and when they had gathered the multitude
together, they delivered the letter.
together, they delivered the letter.
Greek: επιστολην G1992 EPISTLE
Friends this letter can no more be called Scripture than this book I am writing to you. We can cite Scripture; teach on what it means; explain it in detailed format; however, we CANNOT and SHOULD NOT elevate letters "epistles" to the same status as what is God Breathed; or has come from the mouth of the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob.
Acts 22:5:
...as also the high priest bears me witness, and all the counsel of the elders, from who I also
received letters to the brethren...
received letters to the brethren...
Greek: επιστολας G1992 LETTERS
Paul is referring to letters he received from the elders concerning the followers of the Way. These are most definitely NOT Scripture.
Acts 23:33:
When they came to Caesarea and had delivered the letter to the governor, they also
presented Paul to him.
presented Paul to him.
Greek: επιστολην G1992 LETTER
Again; friends this is NOT referring to SCRIPTURE. It is referring to a letter which was intended to give Paul (Sha'ul) the authority to bind believer who still weren't called "Christians" but were called members of "the Way" and bring them to Jerusalem. These were letters which facilitated persecution.
Romans 16:22:
I Tertius, who wrote this epistle, greet you in the LORD.
Greek: επιστολην G1992 EPISTLE
Greek: επιστολην G1992 EPISTLE
I know there are those who are going to scream and stomp; even howl; and, cringe when I assert that we MUST let the Bible define what is scripture and what is not. This is just a letter. We are reading Paul's MAIL to another party; not something God Breathed. Paul's mail is no more Scripture than this book I am writing. I know there are MANY who have already asserted to me that Paul is "God Breathed" yet where is the Biblical PROOF in comparison to the Prophets of Old where it is CLEARLY GOD SPEAKING and INSTRUCTING the Prophet exactly what to say and write. Paul doesn't write this way! In fact often he declares "I say this; NOT GOD." Friends that should be a clue. NOR do ANY other writers of the Bible call Paul Scripture. Yes there are those who will quote Timothy. I would like to remind you that PAUL wrote Timothy; not Timothy. Therefore if you are asserting that Paul called himself Scripture that isn't what I would call strong evidence. It is at best flimsy and has nothing supporting beneath it. Since we cannot use PAUL to prove that Paul is Scripture I ask you this. Where are the two; or, three witnesses by which a thing is establish within the body of the Bible that calls Paul Scripture?
1 Corinthians 5:9:
I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people...
Greek: επιστολη "epistole"
Friends this is EXCELLENT advice. Paul isn't telling us to avoid those within the world around us. It is a given that those who are not keeping Torah; may; or, may not be partaking in practices that Scripture defines as unclean; or abominable. You may work with them; for them; or, possibly be a supervisor for one now. It is not possible to be light; or, salt by shutting yourself in from the world. However you can be in it; and, not OF it. Paul's exhortation is to keep ourselves from those within the body who profess to be believers yet actually aren't. Remember Paul warns us that "a little leaven leavens the whole lump." Sexual immorality has a way of sucking others in. Just look at the many; many; many television evangelists who have fallen to sexually immoral relationships. We are to guard ourselves and one another from such relationships. It isn't just fornication or adultery that is considered sexually immoral. I challenge you to examine Leviticus 18. It lists a plethora of sexually immoral relationships that even the "church" today is seeking to accommodate and "tolerate". There are homosexual and lesbian Pastors; and, even Rabbi's within congregations that do not hold Torah up as being the last word and final authority. We should avoid them. DO NOT SIT UNDER THEM!!! YOU ARE NOT TO BE TAUGHT BY THEM!!!
Paul is REFERENCING Scripture; but, that doesn't make what he writes Scripture in itself. He goes on to list those who are named brethren who are also covetous (Exodus 20:17; Deuteronomy. 5:21), idolaters, revilers, drunkards, and, extortionists which are also covered in Torah. Paul indicates we are not even to EAT with them. Stay away from them. Bad company corrupts moral character. Paul is urging us to guard ourselves against becoming like those types; yet again, this does NOT make Paul Scripture.
Greek: επιστολη "epistole"
Friends this is EXCELLENT advice. Paul isn't telling us to avoid those within the world around us. It is a given that those who are not keeping Torah; may; or, may not be partaking in practices that Scripture defines as unclean; or abominable. You may work with them; for them; or, possibly be a supervisor for one now. It is not possible to be light; or, salt by shutting yourself in from the world. However you can be in it; and, not OF it. Paul's exhortation is to keep ourselves from those within the body who profess to be believers yet actually aren't. Remember Paul warns us that "a little leaven leavens the whole lump." Sexual immorality has a way of sucking others in. Just look at the many; many; many television evangelists who have fallen to sexually immoral relationships. We are to guard ourselves and one another from such relationships. It isn't just fornication or adultery that is considered sexually immoral. I challenge you to examine Leviticus 18. It lists a plethora of sexually immoral relationships that even the "church" today is seeking to accommodate and "tolerate". There are homosexual and lesbian Pastors; and, even Rabbi's within congregations that do not hold Torah up as being the last word and final authority. We should avoid them. DO NOT SIT UNDER THEM!!! YOU ARE NOT TO BE TAUGHT BY THEM!!!
Paul is REFERENCING Scripture; but, that doesn't make what he writes Scripture in itself. He goes on to list those who are named brethren who are also covetous (Exodus 20:17; Deuteronomy. 5:21), idolaters, revilers, drunkards, and, extortionists which are also covered in Torah. Paul indicates we are not even to EAT with them. Stay away from them. Bad company corrupts moral character. Paul is urging us to guard ourselves against becoming like those types; yet again, this does NOT make Paul Scripture.
1 Corinthians 16:3:
And when I come, whomever you approve by your letters I will send to bear your gift to
Jerusalem.
Jerusalem.
Greek: επιστολων "epistolon"
This passage is referring to letters which are most definitely NOT Scripture.
2 Corinthians 3:1-3:
1 Do we begin again to commend ourselves? Or do we need as some others, epistles of
commendation to you or letters of commendation from you? 2 You are our epistle written in
our hearts, known and read by all men; 3 clearly you are an epistle of Christ, ministered
not with ink but by the Spirit of the living God, not to tablets of stone but on tablets of flesh,
that is, of the heart.
commendation to you or letters of commendation from you? 2 You are our epistle written in
our hearts, known and read by all men; 3 clearly you are an epistle of Christ, ministered
not with ink but by the Spirit of the living God, not to tablets of stone but on tablets of flesh,
that is, of the heart.
Greek:
2 Corinthians 3:1: επιστολων "epistolon" (G1992)
2 Corinthians 3:2: επιστολη "epistole" (G1992)
2 Corinthians 3:3: επιστολη "epistole" (G1992)
2 Corinthians 3:1: επιστολων "epistolon" (G1992)
2 Corinthians 3:2: επιστολη "epistole" (G1992)
2 Corinthians 3:3: επιστολη "epistole" (G1992)
This section closely examined is obviously NOT referring to Scripture. Letters of commendation to; or, from someone are NOT Scripture. The Corinthians themselves are NOT Scripture. It is a reference to something written as the term "epistilo" indicates.
2 Corinthians 7:8:
For even if I made you sorry with my letter, I do not regret it; though I did regret it. For I
perceive that the same epistle made you sorry, though only for a while.
perceive that the same epistle made you sorry, though only for a while.
Greek: επιστολη "epistole" (G1992)
επιστολη "epistole" (G1992)
επιστολη "epistole" (G1992)
Here within Paul's own writing we find the translators even indicating that that the term Epistle MEANS a "Letter."
2 Corinthians 10:9-11:
...lest I seem to terrify you by letters. "For his letters,"
they say "are mighty and powerful, but his bodily
presence is weak, and his speech contemptible." Let
such a person consider this, that what we are in word
by letters when we are absent, such we will also be in
deed when we are present.
they say "are mighty and powerful, but his bodily
presence is weak, and his speech contemptible." Let
such a person consider this, that what we are in word
by letters when we are absent, such we will also be in
deed when we are present.
Greek:
10:9: επιστολων G1992 EPISTLES
10:10: επιστολαι G1992 EPISTLES
10:11: επιστολων G1992 EPISTLES
Colossians 4:16:
Now when this epistle is read among you, see that it is read also in the church of the Laodiceans,
and that you likewise read the epistle from Laodicea.
and that you likewise read the epistle from Laodicea.
Greek: επιστολη G1992 EPISTLE
This particular passage is interesting in that it mentions an "epistle FROM Laodicea" that never made its way into the Bible. If an "epistle" is in fact "Scripture" then it would stand to reason that the "scripture" is incomplete. Paul is exhorting those of the Colosse to read his letter TO the Laodiceans.
1 Thessalonians 5:27:
I charge you by the LORD that this epistle be read to all the holy brethren.
Greek: επιστολην G1992 EPISTLE
Nothing here to suggest this is Scripture. Important to read yes; elevated above the word of the true; and, living God no.
2 Thessalonians 2:2:
...not to be soon shaken in mind or troubled, either by
spirit or by word or by letter...
Greek: επιστολης G1992 EPISTLE
AGAIN the text is clear this is a LETTER and is NOT SCRIPTURE
2 Thessalonians 2:15:
Therefore, brethren, stand fast and hold the traditions
which you were taught whether by word or our epistle.
which you were taught whether by word or our epistle.
Greek: επιστολης G1992
2 Thessalonians 3:17:
The salutation of Paul with my own hand, which is a sign in every epistle, so I write.
Greek: επιστολη G1992 EPISTLE
2 Peter 3:1:
Beloved, I now write to you this second epistle (in
both of which I stir up your pure minds by way of
reminder)
both of which I stir up your pure minds by way of
reminder)
Greek: επιστολην G1992 EPISTLE
2 Peter 3:16:
...as in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things
in which are some things hard to understand, which
untaught and unstable people twist to their own
destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.
in which are some things hard to understand, which
untaught and unstable people twist to their own
destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.
Greek: επιστολαις G1992 EPISTLES
Friends there is NOT ONE legitimate example of "epistilo" used in the entire text of the Bible that stands up under intense scrutiny to the assertion that Paul's writing are Scripture; and, to be thought of as such. In fact Paul considered himself the least of all men; and the least of the Apostles; yet, we are to believe that his writings are to be considered at the same level as the Torah; Prophets; writings of old; and used to refute the very words of the Hebrew King who died for Paul's sin as well? That my friends; just doesn't make sense. Use your mind; look at all the evidence. What it is saying? The evidence is screaming loudly that Paul is NOT SCRIPTURE according to the Biblical definition.
Some will no doubt attempt to twist what I have said; accusing me of saying we shouldn't listen to Paul; or, accuse me of saying Paul is a false teacher. I am saying NEITHER of those things. Paul is TEACHING and we should LISTEN; but, we are NOT to elevate Paul ABOVE Scripture; nor, make him equal with it. Paul is NOT the standard to interpret the Bible but rather Torah is the Standard through which we should view and understand Paul. It is the STANDARD that Messiah used; and, if we pay close attention it is the standard Paul uses as well.
Again I would like to remind you that Paul NEVER speaks or writes as the Prophets of old by saying "thus sayeth the LORD;" or writing "the word of the LORD came to me and said." The ONLY encounter where it is CLEAR Paul has had an encounter of some sort is on the road to Damascus when Paul falls down; and, hears a voice that accuses him saying "Saul, Saul why do you persecute Me?" This is documented twice in the book of Acts (Acts 9:4-5; and, 22:7-8). He asserts the voice he heard self identifies as Yeshua of Nazareth; not, (יהוה).
Something else to ponder. I mentioned it earlier but I will close with it. Paul is responsible for writing BOTH letters to Timothy. Often I hear Christians say "Timothy says" as if Timothy wrote them. These are letters from Paul to Timothy. It never fails for a Christian trying to assert that Paul is Scripture to quote the following passage:
Some will no doubt attempt to twist what I have said; accusing me of saying we shouldn't listen to Paul; or, accuse me of saying Paul is a false teacher. I am saying NEITHER of those things. Paul is TEACHING and we should LISTEN; but, we are NOT to elevate Paul ABOVE Scripture; nor, make him equal with it. Paul is NOT the standard to interpret the Bible but rather Torah is the Standard through which we should view and understand Paul. It is the STANDARD that Messiah used; and, if we pay close attention it is the standard Paul uses as well.
Again I would like to remind you that Paul NEVER speaks or writes as the Prophets of old by saying "thus sayeth the LORD;" or writing "the word of the LORD came to me and said." The ONLY encounter where it is CLEAR Paul has had an encounter of some sort is on the road to Damascus when Paul falls down; and, hears a voice that accuses him saying "Saul, Saul why do you persecute Me?" This is documented twice in the book of Acts (Acts 9:4-5; and, 22:7-8). He asserts the voice he heard self identifies as Yeshua of Nazareth; not, (יהוה).
Something else to ponder. I mentioned it earlier but I will close with it. Paul is responsible for writing BOTH letters to Timothy. Often I hear Christians say "Timothy says" as if Timothy wrote them. These are letters from Paul to Timothy. It never fails for a Christian trying to assert that Paul is Scripture to quote the following passage:
2 Timothy 3:16-17
"All Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, for
reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be thoroughly
equipped for every good work."
reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be thoroughly
equipped for every good work."
Friends if the Biblical definition of Scripture points to the TaNaK (the Old Testament); and, we are focused upon the New Testament then how can we say we are thouroughly equipped for every good work? How can we properly teach doctrine? How can we properly reproof another? How can we properly correct? How can we properly instruct in righteousness if we call something Scripture that ISN'T called Scripture by the Bible MEANWHILE rejecting what the Bible calls Scripture and assert is isn't for us; "its for those Jews." For too long this lie has embeeded itself deeply in the pulpit and seminaries. For too long we have inherited lies from our fathers.
For Paul to write 2 Timothy 2:16-17 and then use it to assert that HE HIMSELF is Scripture just doesn't pass the test when we apply pressure. Think about it this way; if Paul is saying HE is scripture, how is that any different than what Mohammad the "prophet" of Islam did when he asserted he was a prophet; and, that was he was delivering was scripture? He was bearing witness of himself. Mohammad placed himself; and, his own words ABOVE the Torah and ABOVE Scripture. Here is what the Qu'ran says:
"Muhammad is...the messenger of Allah and the Seal of the Prophets." Surat Al-Ahzab 33:40
Friends; modern day Christianity is guilty of doing to Paul's letters what Mohammad did with his own writings; abrogating the Torah of (יהוה) and negating Scripture. Messiah indicates that we must live by every word that comes from the mouth of (יהוה); not from the mouth of Paul. Messiah indicated that one who bears witness of himself is a false witness (John 5:31).
Timothy isn't saying Paul is Scripture; because Timothy didn't write the letter with the title name "Timothy" Paul did. Follow along with me now as we briefly look at other "epistles" which are non-biblical in nature as we round off the discussion about the term "epistles."
No comments:
Post a Comment